Should we let the dirtbag die?

Dear Dr. Brilliant Cliché,

I am a mental health worker. Today I received the strangest request. One of my clients, who has had a less than reputable past which includes drug abuse and alcohol, is now older and sober; but he is paying the price. He has gone into kidney failure and he will die if he doesn’t get a transplant. His life can be temporarily prolonged with dialysis but only a transplant can make him well. Today, the transplant center called me to ask if he is mentally capable of receiving a transplant. They told me that kidneys are very scarce and if he will be noncompliant with treatment his body will reject the organ. This would be a waste when it could have gone to someone else. Additionally, the medications required after a transplant will be very harsh on his mind and body. Essentially, they needed me to tell them if he is worth saving. This is an argument I can run many ways in my head. What is your opinion?

Life or death

Dear Life,

Mental health is not relevant to this case at all and neither is your own opinion. Our cultural standard demands that, right or wrong, one cannot withhold lifesaving procedures based on mental health, sex, or race. Not even for economic reasons although in reality health insurance withholds treatment all the time from people.

If this man’s insurance covers it or he is willing to pay for it himself and the kidney is available, in our culture, he has a right to it. If dialysis is an equally effective treatment alternative then it is between the patient and his doctor to decide those options. If dialysis is a lesser treatment, you cannot substitute it simply because you might feel he is less deserving of the kidney than someone else. Even if you feel he might not be compliant with treatment follow up, this doesn’t justify the right to withhold treatment. It would just require extra effort on the treatment provider’s side to help him with compliance issues.

All you can say as a mental health professional and licensed doctor is whether the patient is able to understand the proposed procedure, risks and benefits, and if he is mentally capable of signing his own consent.

Medical ethics is a fascinating field but like law it is not simply based on ethical right or wrong. What determines right or wrong? What is right for the individual often conflicts with what is right for the community as a whole. Therefore many ethical decisions in medicine are based on legal rulings and or community standard.

Dr. Brilliant Cliché

Granny says: This confuses me. If the transplant issue is a matter of law, why is the transplant center seeking this mental health worker’s opinion? Are they taking the law into their own hands and playing God? That seems unlikely. I would like to know the reasoning behind this unusual request.

However, if you want Granny’s opinion- if this issue of who gets the kidney WERE to be decided on intrinsic worthiness, it would not be possible to make such a decision without a thorough investigation into the next kidney patient on the list as well. The patient who was described seems no less worthy of an organ than anyone else. Everyone has problems and no one is without fault…but this man has faced up to his wrongs and through his own efforts he has overcome problems which many people lack the character to address. In my eyes, this would make him more worthy, not less. We cannot judge people by the mistakes they make. If we are to judge them at all, it would be to judge their willingness to accept responsibility for those mistakes and their efforts to right the wrongs. Anyone can coast along an even path…it takes a strong individual to survive an earthquake. Many people who resort to drugs are in terrible emotional or physical pain for reasons not entirely their own. I do not judge them. I feel at least an initial compassion for them. It’s the boneheads who don’t even bother to try that I have no use for.

Dr. Brilliant clarifies:

No this isn’t a legal issue technically. I said medical ethics decisions function like law based on a community standard.


About Dr. Brilliant Cliché

Dr. Brilliant Cliché and the Granny Dr. are a fictional web presence and advice blog. Together we offer a joint perspective that is deep but not academic, entertaining but not fluff, and educated yet street smart. By joining the internet community we hope to share thoughts and stimulate insightful conversation around pressing issues that affect us all. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. (This is not a site for therapy nor does it intend to replace medical or other professional care. ) You can leave comments here or email The Dr. at and don’t forget to like us on facebook. Our facebook page is Dr. Brilliant Cliche
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Should we let the dirtbag die?

  1. Everyone is entitled to the best that medicine can offer. We can not pass judgment on a person’s capacity to understand or behave. If there is an issue of understanding and compliance with treatment, its just another component that requires assistance. If a man is raised by wolves on a desert island and later joins society and is in need of a kidney, we wouldn’t judge him for his erratic behavior. We would say he’s a product of his upbringing and would do everything we could to acclimate him to what he needs to know. Yet, if he were brought up among humans but doesn’t fit into our standards, we immediately say it is his fault and the environment has nothing to do with it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s